One answer might be that majorities are not thought to need protection. We hears paeans of praise to “minority rights,” but these are really the human rights of people who happen to be in a minority. Majorities have such rights, too. And they need protection, even in a democracy, when government agencies are staffed by people hostile to them.The religious sociologist Peter Berger compared the United States in religious terms to a nation of Indians government by Swedes. The same could be said of Canada–with the proviso that the Swedes have more power through human rights commissions and the courts to impose an anti-Christian view on such matters as homosexuality.
A second agent of anti-Christianity is our postmodern, deconstructionist anti-culture. An article of faith among the liberal humanists who dominate Canadian and Western culture today is that no point of view may legitimately make absolute truth claims. Chrsitians, on the other hand, cannot avoid doing just that. They believe that all just law is based on God’s natural law, and that moral standards of the Bible are universally applicable. Christianity invites hostility because it contradicts the tenets of liberal-humanism. We are the infidels of today.
Because most Christians cannot grant other religions are “equally true,” post-modern liberals see us as intolerant. Of course, this misunderstands tolerance, which implies disapproval of or disagreement with the thing tolerated. They assume because these intolerant Christians are the majority, then society needs protection from them. So they are disposed to regard expressions of Christian belief as oppressive and other religious expressions as an exciting example of diversity.
Anti-Christianity is grossly underestimated by most Christians. Many churches have capitulated to contemporary ideological fashions, or been routed into a cowardly retreat from the oublic square.
Yet it is impossible to build a coherent nation without a dominant culture–and in Canada that is Christianity or nothing. Some of multiculturalism’s strongest advocates are people who came from countries where there is little or no freedom. What they fail to see is that the prosperity and freedom they desire evolved out of Judaeo-Christian values. It is foolhardy to imagine that the advantages of Christian society can be maintained against Christianity. 
© 1998 National Post