The New York Times]
Head of the BBC
JOHN TUSA was the Czech-born former newscaster, producer, and ultimately director-general of the BBC, and a writer in his own right. Mr Irving had helped him on occasions with documents and advice from own his researches. Tusa’s wife Ann wrote the first (and premature) review of Mr Irving’s book Nuremberg, the Last Battle in The Daily Telegraph. She published this several weeks before the embargo-release date, possibly in the hope of killing its chances elsewhere. In this she failed, as the book was widely praised. John and Ann Tusa had published their own potboiler history of the Nuremberg Trial several years before.
|
London, April 1997 Dear John,[1] David Irving: Nuremberg, the Last Battle SEEMS LIKE only yesterday I bumped into you at the PRO when you were working on Nuremberg. I was just screening through old files for two libel actions I am bringing (Discovery), and came across our brief correspondence in 1983 when you were working on the book. Last November — so I am told — Ann lacerated my own on the subject, claiming it yielded nothing new. (I took a peep at your reprint a few days ago at Selfridges’, and while I see it lists R H Jackson’s papers at the National Archives, it doesn’t appear to use his private papers including his diaries and letters from Nuremberg, which were at Chicago when I used them, and are now in the Library of Congress; nor the private papers of Andrus, the Nuremberg commandant, nor . . . uh, etc., etc.) People tell me Ann also called me sloppy for not using the Blue Volumes; if she had really read the book, she would have seen I explained why.[2] Anyway, here with my compliments is a copy of the book as published, to replace the heap of Xeroxes (presumably) read when writing her review. If she did read it, that will be more than Norman Stone did, who I suspect merely read the review written by, Guess Whom?, before writing his own in The Sunday Times. If there are any major wartime projects you’re working on, don’t hesitate to call upon my resources; I do know quite a bit about that time, you know.
Yours faithfully, |
Further notes:
|