The International Campaign for Real History
 Published: London, Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Slaughter in Dresden Deplorable attempts to play down the slaughter of Dresden
Curiously, it was the post-1945 Communist mayor of Dresden, Walter Weidauer, who first advanced the much reduced figure of 35,000 — for political reasons. He attacked Irving for helping “[Western] Imperialists’ spread the notion that atomic bombing was no worse than a major conventional air-raid” (Walter Weidauer, Inferno Dresden, 1966). Since this down-playing of the casualty figures resulted from the (very understandable) wish to highlight the distinctive horrors of atomic bombing, GDR official documents on this subject must surely remain suspect. None of the raid survivors, Protestant clergy and civic officials involved in the Dresden-Coventry partnership whom I met ever doubted the number of deaths was over 100,000, even if the Voigt-Irving figure could not be exactly verified. Certainly the very extensive area of the Heidefriedhof (official cemetery) indicated corpses on that scale.
Irving himself proposed a British appeal to build a memorial in Dresden, but after wide-ranging consultation, Coventry Cathedral’s project with the GDR Christian “Action Reconciliation” organisation, to rebuild the maternity wing of the Protestant Deaconess Hospital, gutted by the RAF, became the celebrated practical expression of British-German reconciliation across the Cold War divide. And Provost Williams always accepted the 135,000 death toll. The Rev. Brian Cooper The Independent publishes, on Monday, April 30, 2007, this reply from a notably well-briefed woman with an evident vested interest in denying the Dresden Holocaust Dresden ‘research’ was ruled invalid
Professor Evans made a detailed analysis of Irving’s work in his role as a defence witness in the Irving libel trial in 2000. Mr Justice Gray, in his ruling, stated “the estimates of 100,000 and more deaths which Irving continued to put about in the 1990s lacked evidential basis and were as such as no responsible historian would have made”.
These factual findings are at variance with Mr Cooper’s claim that Irving’s research into Dresden is not invalidated. Indeed, Mr Justice Gray said the Dresden figures from Irving’s book are an example of “occasions where Irving’s treatment of the historical evidence is so perverse and egregious it is difficult to believe it is inadvertence on his part”. The suffering and loss of life in the Dresden bombing was terrible, and the Coventry reconciliation is a noble effort to redress some of that wrong. Mr Cooper’s claims do nothing to advance the Coventry reconciliation effort. To use the “research” of a discredited author in support of a cause not only weakens the cause but besmirches its very nature. Fiona Assersohn The dead of Dresden
Wednesday, May 2, 2007 Sir: It is universally accepted that Nazis who committed atrocities against civilian populations, sometimes in response to resistance actions, killing dozens, perhaps hundreds at a time – men women and children – were guilty of war crimes. David Irving was probably wrong in his claim of 135,000 killed in the Dresden firebombing (letter, 27 April). The real figure was maybe 50,000, perhaps only 25,000 civilians – men women and children. So that’s all right, then. Mike Parker
Mr Irving’s figures on this subject were based[*] upon a document of dubious authenticity called Order of the Day 47 (TB47), which has since been claimed to be a forgery by many, if not most, authorities on the bombing – and even Mr Irving himself has cast doubt upon its authenticity. This is, in itself, a terrible figure. But it is not the 100,000-plus that Mr Cooper presumes it to be. Marc Jones
In 1943 the city of Hamburg was subjected to heavy and systematic bombing which resulted in a “firestorm”, that is a hurricane-like storm induced by the colossal scale and acute temperatures of the conflagration. Until the Dresden raid, Hamburg represented the pinnacle in horror the bombing campaign against German cities could reach. In Hamburg it is known that at least 40,000 lost their lives. Yet regarding Dresden, where there was a more massive concentration of destructive force, where the firestorm lasted two days and nights, where air-raid shelters were lacking, where population density was bloated by an influx of refugees, where there was no air defence to speak of, where over swaths of the urban landscape temperatures were reached whereby victims sheltering in basements succumbed en masse, we are expected to believe that actually fewer perished than in Hamburg. The fashionable figure now being cited is between 25,000 and 35,000. I am not impressed. TimO’Sullivan The new updated edition of “Apocalypse 1945: the Destruction of Dresden” is now available. Click to order now.
|
Mr Justice Gray 
© Focal Point 2007 
write to David Irving
