Documents on Real History
|
<valign=”top”></valign=”top”>
Index to the Traditional Enemies of Free Speech Alphabetical index (text) |
|
|
|
Letters to David Irving on this Website
Unless correspondents ask us not to, this Website will post selected letters that it receives, and invite open debate. |
|
Gene Mangrum of Nashville Tennessee thinks (Wednesday, August 25, 2004) the 9/11 hijackers were not intrepid
Umbrage at “intrepid”
I AM an avid fan of yours and your website. But I think you should refrain from language which may be interpreted as sympathetic to terrorists. It does not lend credibility or credence to your overall message. I quote:
“Hazard a guess that it spelt out in simple, credible language the reasons why Atta and his eighteen intrepid men were sacrificing themselves to attack Wall Street, the Pentagon, and the Capitol?”
I don’t think these punks were “intrepid”. “Cowardly” is more like it. I think people who kill innocent people or use innocent people’s lives as simple cannon fodder are nothing more than cowards. Terrorism is a desperate act by those who feel powerless and are too cowardly to attack those who directly threaten them. One should not describe these types of cowards as brave or “intrepid”.
I certainly hope that you don’t sympathize with these scoundrels. I don’t think you do and I don’t think you intentionally mean to portray these terrorists as heroes or martyrs or sympathetic characters. But I just ask that you try to refrain from language that might be interpreted as support for these terrorist scumbags.
Gene Mangrum
Nashville, TN
|
DAVID IRVING writes:HOW kind of you to write. If you read The 9/11 Commission Report then “intrepid” is the only word to describe the actions of these nineteen young men — in my view. I did not say “admirable,” I said: “Intrepid.”
Seizing control of a heavy airliner with a full load of fuel, cargo, and passengers and flying it deliberately into an “enemy” skyscraper takes more guts than launching a cruise missile from an aircraft carrier or submarine hundreds of miles away, or dropping cluster-bombs from an altitude of 30,000 feet or firing thousands of rounds of 50- caliber ammunition* into a village from a C-130 Spectre gunship, or … or … or … etc.
Would you deny the Japanese kamikaze airmen the description “intrepid”?
* Aubrey Soper corrects me on Friday, August 27, 2004 about the armament carried by the Spectre gunship:
|
|
|
© Focal Point 2004
David Irving